Learn Courses preview Course plans by Shane Rounce. Enrolment is not open.
← All courses Course plan · Enrolment not openApplication engineering · Self-pacedMeasure and improve frontend performance without breaking behaviour
With Shane Rounce
I teach measure and improve frontend performance without breaking behaviour through a practical project, worked examples and checks that another person can repeat. This is a complete course plan; lesson recordings, workbooks and delivery are still to be produced.
4 weeks20 learning hoursSelf-paced
I’m developing this course as part of Learn Courses. This is the full teaching plan, ready to review before I produce the lessons and open enrolment.
IS THIS FOR YOU?Who I’m building this for
Frontend developers and technical site owners.
Before you begin
- A computer with a current browser and permission to use the project material.
- Basic familiarity with Git and the relevant development tools. Work takes place in an isolated test environment.
- No client records, credentials or production changes are needed for the exercises.
PROPOSED COURSE FEE£149
Provisional planning figure, not an approved price or an offer for sale. I have assumed reusable self-paced lessons and bounded support. Production effort, access period, assessment support and tax treatment need confirming before sale.
Planning price only. Enrolment is closed and no payment is taken.
Explore a sample learning space →The sample is fictional. It is separate from this course’s future lessons.
A PRACTICAL NEXT STEPWhat you’ll be able to do
- Record device, network, route and data availability before comparing scores.
- Reserve image space and test long text and delayed assets across breakpoints.
- Size media and defer nonessential work while preserving the first user action.
- Compare equivalent runs and verify interaction, measurement and access after optimisation.
THE TEACHING PLANYour next 4 weeks
A clear route through the subject, with something to make, test or reflect on at every stage.
01MODULE 1Separate field and lab evidence
I explain the decisions behind separate field and lab evidence using worked examples, a deliberately broken case and a corrected version. The lesson distinguishes what the evidence establishes from what still needs checking.
- Your practical activity
- Record device, network, route and data availability before comparing scores.
- How I’ll check your understanding
- Submit the working artefact and a short evidence note for module 1: record device, network, route and data availability before comparing scores. Include the initial state, the chosen change, a meaningful failure case and the result of the check. I review whether the evidence supports the conclusion and return specific revisions where it does not.
02MODULE 2Control unstable layout
I explain the decisions behind control unstable layout using worked examples, a deliberately broken case and a corrected version. The lesson distinguishes what the evidence establishes from what still needs checking.
- Your practical activity
- Reserve image space and test long text and delayed assets across breakpoints.
- How I’ll check your understanding
- Submit the working artefact and a short evidence note for module 2: reserve image space and test long text and delayed assets across breakpoints. Include the initial state, the chosen change, a meaningful failure case and the result of the check. I review whether the evidence supports the conclusion and return specific revisions where it does not.
03MODULE 3Optimise the useful payload
I explain the decisions behind optimise the useful payload using worked examples, a deliberately broken case and a corrected version. The lesson distinguishes what the evidence establishes from what still needs checking.
- Your practical activity
- Size media and defer nonessential work while preserving the first user action.
- How I’ll check your understanding
- Submit the working artefact and a short evidence note for module 3: size media and defer nonessential work while preserving the first user action. Include the initial state, the chosen change, a meaningful failure case and the result of the check. I review whether the evidence supports the conclusion and return specific revisions where it does not.
04MODULE 4Retest the complete journey
I explain the decisions behind retest the complete journey using worked examples, a deliberately broken case and a corrected version. The lesson distinguishes what the evidence establishes from what still needs checking.
- Your practical activity
- Compare equivalent runs and verify interaction, measurement and access after optimisation.
- How I’ll check your understanding
- Submit the working artefact and a short evidence note for module 4: compare equivalent runs and verify interaction, measurement and access after optimisation. Include the initial state, the chosen change, a meaningful failure case and the result of the check. I review whether the evidence supports the conclusion and return specific revisions where it does not.
PUT IT INTO PRACTICEYour final project
Build and document a complete practical project for measure and improve frontend performance without breaking behaviour. Use an invented organisation or an expressly permitted personal project, join the four module artefacts into one coherent result and demonstrate a normal journey, a failure state and a recovery or revision.
What you’ll produce
- Module 1 artefact: Record device, network, route and data availability before comparing scores.
- Module 2 artefact: Reserve image space and test long text and delayed assets across breakpoints.
- Module 3 artefact: Size media and defer nonessential work while preserving the first user action.
- Module 4 artefact: Compare equivalent runs and verify interaction, measurement and access after optimisation.
- A concise project brief, source and rights record, evidence log and handover with known limitations.
What good work looks like
- Separate field and lab evidence: 20 marks for a correct artefact, justified decisions and repeatable evidence.
- Control unstable layout: 20 marks for a correct artefact, justified decisions and repeatable evidence.
- Optimise the useful payload: 20 marks for a correct artefact, justified decisions and repeatable evidence.
- Retest the complete journey: 20 marks for a correct artefact, justified decisions and repeatable evidence.
- Integration and handover: 20 marks for a coherent project, source acknowledgement, appropriate access and a clear explanation of remaining limits. Pass requires at least 70/100 and correction of any privacy, access or destructive-operation defect before completion.
Resources for your learning
- A worked example and a deliberately broken fixture for separate field and lab evidence.
- A worked example and a deliberately broken fixture for control unstable layout.
- A worked example and a deliberately broken fixture for optimise the useful payload.
- A worked example and a deliberately broken fixture for retest the complete journey.
- A measure and improve frontend performance without breaking behaviour workbook with evidence prompts and the capstone marking sheet.
- A transcript, caption file and text-first lesson version for every recording.
- A downloadable source-and-rights checklist and a sample completed project handover.
A course you can access
- Provide edited captions, transcripts and a text-first route through every lesson.
- Use keyboard-operable exercises, visible focus, legible contrast and no essential autoplay or motion.
- Supply downloadable instructions and low-bandwidth alternatives; avoid timed assessment as a default.
- Offer equivalent written evidence where live attendance or spoken presentation is a barrier and document support before enrolment.
FINISH WITH SOMETHING USEFULHow you’ll complete the course
- Submit all four module artefacts and respond to assessment feedback.
- Complete the capstone at 70/100 or above with no unresolved access, privacy or destructive-operation defect.
- Explain a meaningful failure case and the limits of the result in the evidence log.
- Completion records describe assessed participation; I am not claiming external accreditation.
Completion will describe the work you have done. No external accreditation or professional qualification is claimed.
BEFORE I OPEN ENROLMENTWhat I still need to finish
I’ll turn this plan into a delivered course once the teaching material and the learning service are ready.
- Produce and editorially review the four lessons, worked examples, broken fixtures and marking guidance for measure and improve frontend performance without breaking behaviour.
- Build and test the course-specific workbook and capstone reference project using synthetic or permitted material.
- Pilot the complete learner journey, including mobile, keyboard, captions, assessment feedback and recovery from interrupted access.
- Approve the actual price, tax treatment, refund terms, access period, support boundaries and any cohort dates before accepting payment.
- Implement and test authentication, server-side paid entitlements, webhook reconciliation, private asset access and tenant isolation before unlocking paid lessons.
- Confirm tutor availability, feedback turnaround, moderation responsibilities and capacity before advertising tutor-led support.
- Review source licences, sample rights and current official technical guidance before recording or publishing the material.
FURTHER READINGThe ideas behind the course
My published articles are background reading for this plan. The full lessons, activities and assessment material still need producing.